All Children Left Behind

Maybe I’m simplifying matters, but these days I see media overly preoccupied with stories about the guessing game of which Republican will run for president, a Frenchman who accosted an American maid, another philandering governor, and, to a lesser degree, Charlie Sheen’s replacement and the new television season (better called the Madison Avenue message delivery mechanism).

Meanwhile, despite some recent notable exceptions (Wisconsin), this country’s commitment to providing the means to cultivate an educated public and informed citizenry is being flushed down the toilet in relative quiet.  Wasn’t it just yesterday when the talking heads were nodding sagely at the wisdom of the “No Child Left Behind” initiative.  This unfunded mandate was willingly shouldered by such states as Texas, with Gov. Rick “States-Right-to be Ignorant” Perry at the helm, because, after all, education is our future.

But one day we awoke in a new world where it was “Torpedoes be damned!” against education, particularly teachers and school districts.  As a result, the teacher ranks will suffer layoffs, benefit reductions, and pension cuts.  That’s before they even walk into increasingly larger classes, fewer neighborhood campuses, and experience cuts in libraries, the arts and extracurricular activities.  Peggy Noonan, former Nixon speech writer, explained on Morning Joe one day recently that cutting the education budgets seemed reasonable to Republicans and tea partiers, because “they don’t see all that money going to children.”  I don’t get it, Peggy.  Do they believe that children should be teaching themselves?  Administering tests and developing curricula?  Or has there been an epidemic of administrators buying new cars and taking lavish trips with school funds?  What did I miss?

Or do they simply believe teachers should impoverish themselves in order to selflessly teach our children?  What kind of irrationality do they attribute to educators that would cause them to eschew their own self-interest and better paying jobs (and ones with less stress, surely) outside of the teaching profession?  The obvious reality is that education happens because  money is spent on  teachers, testing, buildings, bus drivers, and administrators.

Moreover, it is the insanity of this funding crisis that the school districts must comply with the laws that Legislature has imposed on them, funded or not.  As AISD Trustee Lori Moya wrote in a recent letter to the editor in the Austin-American, “School districts aren’t asking for more money.  We’re asking for enough money to meet state requirements and mandates.”

The only conclusion one can come to is that we’re in the midst of a right-wing campaign to dumb down the American public and consolidate their power over hearts and minds.   Accordingly, institutions and programs that exist to foster a more informed citizenry must be strangled to death.  Why else declare war on the Public Broadcasting System and National Public Radio, media outlets that inform Americans about the world in which we live and the politics, the science, and the literature that inform this world?

No, Americans should be fed a steady diet of network and cable television in order to get our marching orders from Madison Avenue.   The right wing wants to be sure that American heads get their fill of fare that make them good consumers and distract them from any critical thinking.  Just look at the television schedule and its distraction of murder, mayhem, and reality shows that have nothing to do with “reality” as we know it.  Like, what’s with The Bachelor?  How does it escape attacks from the right wing, when it totally trivializes marriage?  Isn’t that institution sacrosanct in their books – at least until they are discovered toe dancing in bathroom stalls, hiking in Argentina, or paying off the mistress and her family?

And if you consider the squelching our children’s potential as the right-wing objective, the battle over Planned Parenthood even begins to make sense.  The clients who use their services the most are the poor.  If fewer of the poor get abortions (which to the R-mind is all that PP does), they will have more children, preventing their ability to escape their impoverished condition.  Neither the parents or their offspring, mired in poverty and working their minimum wage jobs at best, will ever have the time or energy to acquire the education and skills it takes to make it to the middle class (assuming one still exists).  The children will never grow up to question Big Oil subsidies . . . or any other form of corporate welfare.

The situation is particularly dire in Texas.  Back in February, Paul Krugman wrote of the Texas budget cuts and pointed out that Texas is 43rd of 50 in state rankings in high school graduation rate.  Further, he wrote, the state ranks 5th in poverty nationally and leads in the percentage of children without health insurance.  Medicaid is being cut to such a degree that many fear  doctors will start refusing to see Medicaid patients.  Add to these grim statistics the prospect of as many as 100,000 layoffs in education sector.  Krugman poses the question that he heard asked by many business people in Texas:  how can the state prosper in the long run with a future work force blighted by childhood poverty, poor health and lack of education?

But obviously, Paul Krugman and Texas business leaders don’t get the same memos the Republican governors get.  Those memos explain that they can’t depend on the educated classes anymore.  They must hitch their wagons with the tea party whose loyalists could care a flying flip about education policy and the long-term health of a country and its economic system.

One Texas state representative (Democrat) said recently about the new crop of legislators from the right wing and tea party, in particular, “They are delighted that Texas is having this budget crises because that gives them the excuse to reduce government to where it  can be dragged into the bathroom and drowned in the bathtub a la Grover Norquist.” No matter that we’re flushing the future of our children and this country down the drain, too.  An educated electorate merely gets in the way of dismantling government as we know it.

As unbelievable as it is, I have to wonder, whether I will wake up to find that this was all just a bad dream?  If so, I’m just hopin’ George Bush is still gone.

Advertisements

About nowandthenadays

Observer of life who writes about Austin, women's issues, history, and politics. I retired as a Texas Assistant Attorney General after almost 40 years in state government in May, 2013.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to All Children Left Behind

  1. Angela says:

    I am just catching up on your very funny, poignant blog! I hope it goes beyond 2011…I will keep reading. I was looking for the quote from Ken Follet, thinking it was from another source, and your blog popped up…but I am still searching for the quote! It was; “Pilgrims should not spend too much time planning their journey-for they might learn of so many hazards they would decide not to go.” It seemed appropriate advice for a post I am writing on how to be a good tourist. And yes, airports are still as bad today as 3 years ago and education is a mess; my blog is “A Homeschool Story” but I have one child in public school and it is not pretty. I have also been traveling extensively, so 2 of your topics are right up my ally! Well done!

    • Thanks, Angela. Yes, the blog goes beyond 2011 although I don’t have time to post as much as I did prior to 2013. My father has fallen ill and I’m suddenly running his life and dealing with a lot of mundane things that keep me from writing. Will still keep trying, though. Thanks for the inspiration!

  2. Ruthie Howard says:

    Frankly, I believe the government wants to get out of the education business. Thus, you have charter schools who are not required to take the state tests taking over the role of the education of children. If you think public schools are doing a poor job of education just wait to see what the charter schools turn out. It isn’t uncommon to have teachers in charter schools who do not have education degrees and lack quality inservice training. They are generally not qualified to identify or education children with any special need-special education or gifted and talented students. As you can tell, my experiences with children coming from charter schools is not positive.

  3. Tom says:

    What I keep wondering about the right wing’s desire to cut education is this:

    Most of them are extremely pro-military. Who are they going to get to do their weapons research? Americans won’t have the education anymore. They’ll have to contract out the work to the Chinese, who may be the enemy!

    • Incoherence and inconsistency seem to be hallmarks of their positions. On the other hand, I wonder if there is such a thing as “enemies” when you are a big corporate interest integrated in a global economy and invested everywhere.

Whatcha think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s